A con artist who promised easy riches through a fake business opportunity scheme has settled with the FTC, agreeing to pay $7.5 million in damages while admitting to bilking consumers out of millions.
Samuel James Smith ran Blueprint to Wealth alongside accomplices Bob Shafer and Charles Garis. The operation was straightforward fraud: they lured people in with bogus promises of huge returns, then took their money.
The FTC sued all three men in January. Smith folded first, signing a consent judgment approved by the court on May 31st.
The settlement hammers Smith with permanent restrictions that essentially end his career in the money-making scheme business. He's banned from involvement with any "money making method"—his term for any process sold with claims that it's exclusive and will generate income for buyers. That prohibition extends to acting as a webmaster or data host for such schemes, or helping anyone else run them.
Smith also can't touch prerecorded messages. The order bars him from initiating or assisting with outbound robocalls that use prerecorded pitches. He can't use prerecorded messages to answer inbound calls for marketing purposes. He can't own a financial stake in any business that relies on this tactic.
Beyond the operational restraints, Smith faces a decade of compliance monitoring. The FTC will watch his financial moves and business activities closely.
On the money side, the numbers get murky. Smith is supposed to pay $7.5 million jointly with Shafer and Garis. But his actual cash obligation? Just $3,000 from a Zions Bank account in his name. The rest of his share is suspended based on his claimed financial situation.
That disparity is telling. Shafer and Garis appear to be holding most of the assets and facing the bulk of the financial liability. Smith, it seems, either spent or hid the money.
The FTC clearly views Smith as the smaller fish in this operation. Settlement came quickly and cheaply for him, which suggests prosecutors are saving their ammunition for the bigger targets. Smith's consent order requires him to fully cooperate with the FTC going forward—a standard move when the government anticipates taking other defendants to trial.
The settlement is a reminder that fraud schemes like Blueprint to Wealth work because people want to believe in shortcuts to wealth. These operators exploit that hope systematically, making money hand over fist before authorities catch up. Smith got off relatively light. Whether Shafer and Garis face tougher consequences remains to be seen.
🤖 Quick Answer
Who is Samuel Smith and what charges did he face?Samuel James Smith is a con artist who operated Blueprint to Wealth, a fraudulent scheme promising unrealistic financial returns. He and accomplices Bob Shafer and Charles Garis defrauded consumers of millions through false business opportunity claims, leading to FTC legal action in January.
What settlement did Samuel Smith reach with the FTC?
Smith agreed to pay $7.5 million in damages and signed a consent judgment approved by the court on May 31st. He was the first defendant among the three accused to settle the fraud case brought by federal regulators.
What restrictions were imposed on Samuel Smith following the settlement?
Smith received permanent restrictions banning him from involvement with any "money making method" or process sold with claims of exclusivity and guaranteed returns. These prohibitions effectively terminate his participation in scheme-based business operations.
🔗 Related Articles
- The Traders Domain Ponzi MLM investor master list
- Holiguards, the Forsage Ponzi movie directed by… Kevin Spacey?
- Massachusetts charge TelexFree as “billion dollar Ponzi”
- PureNRG FX Review: A Playboy branded energy drink?
- Ryan Evans settles Saivian fraud with SEC