Redwood Scientific Technologies continue to miss production deadlines

Redwood Scientific Technologies keeps promising to hand over documents to federal investigators. It keeps breaking those promises.

The company behind the multi-level marketing scheme Rengalife faces accusations of violating the FTC Act. Rather than cooperate, Redwood has stonewalled the agency at nearly every turn. Now, four weeks after a federal judge scheduled a hearing to address the obstruction, Redwood has missed four of five self-imposed deadlines and admitted its previous document productions contained "deficiencies."

The pattern is stark. In eight months of dealing with an FTC Civil Investigative Demand, Redwood has failed to meet every single deadline it claimed it would meet.

The trouble began well before the April 23rd show cause hearing. When the FTC requested documents, Redwood refused to cooperate fully. Agents traveled from Washington D.C. to court expecting a confrontation. Instead, the night before the hearing—a Sunday—Redwood's attorney sent a last-minute email acknowledging the company had not provided all responsive records. The attorney promised the court would see results soon. Five new production deadlines were offered, stretching from April 27th through May 25th.

The judge continued the hearing to May 29th, effectively giving Redwood another chance.

April 27th came and went. No documents arrived. Redwood's attorney never provided the promised information. Over the next four weeks, the company was supposed to meet five separate deadlines. It missed four of them.

By May 22nd, when the FTC filed its status report, Redwood had delivered only two productions—both from March 22nd and April 9th, both admittedly incomplete. The company's attorney never bothered responding to the FTC's requests for explanation during the interim period. Not until May 22nd did she surface with a new excuse: the FTC's search terms had generated too many results, and the company's vendor, Lighthouse, couldn't handle the volume.

Another promise followed. Redwood would produce documents on May 23rd.

The FTC gave Redwood's attorney the opportunity to contribute to the status report, perhaps to explain the repeated failures. Radio silence came back. The agency heard nothing until after the deadline had passed.

What emerges is not incompetence but a strategy. Redwood commits, fails, commits again, fails again. Each broken promise delays the investigation further. Each missed deadline withholds responsive information the FTC needs to determine what violations occurred. The company's repeated assurances followed by non-compliance have become the weapon itself.

Federal judges do not take kindly to parties who ignore court orders. But the pattern here goes beyond mere neglect. Redwood has demonstrated it will make commitments it does not intend to keep, deploy technical obstacles as excuses, and ignore its own counsel's promises—all while a federal investigation stalls.

🤖 Quick Answer

What legal issues does Redwood Scientific Technologies face?

Why has the FTC taken action against Redwood Scientific Technologies?
The FTC initiated action due to Redwood's involvement in Rengalife, a multi-level marketing operation. The agency suspects violations of the FTC Act and seeks documents to substantiate these allegations through a formal Civil Investigative Demand process.

How has Redwood Scientific Technologies responded to FTC requests?
Redwood has consistently stonewalled the FTC throughout the investigation. In eight months, the company failed to meet every self-imposed deadline, missed four of five deadlines before a federal judge's hearing, and admitted previous

🔗 Related Articles

- Did the DSA know AdvoCare was going to screw over distributors?
- Did Talk Fusion pay off affiliates who made pyramid allegations?
- Alan Friedland settles CompCoin fraud with CFTC
- Alex Morton’s Jeunesse – where is the retail?
- FTC sues Bob Shafer, Samuel Smith & Charles Garis for fraud