A federal fraud trial against Redwood Scientific Technologies won't happen this summer. The FTC pushed back the case last month as pandemic lockdowns shut down courtrooms and forced staff to work from home.

The trial was originally set for July 14. But on March 17, the FTC filed a motion asking the court to delay everything until October 20. The agency said it couldn't meet the April 13 deadline for filing dispositive motions—the documents that determine what evidence gets presented at trial. With staff working remotely across Washington, DC, where the FTC's litigation team operates, the work simply couldn't get done on schedule.

The timing made sense. California had declared a state of emergency on March 4. DC followed suit on March 11. Courts were tightening restrictions on public gatherings and travel. More shutdowns looked inevitable.

Co-defendants Jason and Eunjung Cardiff didn't fight the delay. The court granted the FTC's motion on March 19.

The case against Redwood Scientific Technologies remains shrouded in limited public information. The FTC's complaint allegations haven't been detailed here, but the agency had filed a separate contempt motion that was scheduled for a March 30 hearing.

That hearing got cancelled. As of late March, the court hadn't yet ruled on whether Redwood or the Cardiffs violated previous court orders.

The docket will tell the story as this case moves forward. For now, everyone waits until October.

🤖 Quick Answer

Why was the Redwood Scientific Technologies fraud trial postponed?
The trial was delayed from July 14 to October 20, 2020, due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns. The Federal Trade Commission's litigation team, operating remotely from Washington, DC, could not meet the April 13 deadline for filing dispositive motions—documents determining which evidence would be presented at trial.

What circumstances led to the court's decision to grant the delay?
California and Washington, DC declared states of emergency in early March 2020. Courtrooms shut down and staff transitioned to remote work, making it impossible for the FTC to complete necessary litigation preparation within the required timeframe.

🔗 Related Articles

- Global Trading Club scammers on track to settle with CFTC
- Eddie Alexandre cops $243 mill judgment in CFTC’s EminiFX case
- FTC’s Success By Health lawsuit survives motion to dismiss
- Sean Brown reaches Digital Altitude fraud settlement with FTC
- Juan Herman cops $250,000 Traders Domain contempt fine