Konstantin Ignatov’s hopes of a smooth pre-trial release have been dashed, following a damning opposition filing.

According to the DOJ, there are no bail conditions that would assure Ignatov won’t flee the US.

Reasons cited by the DOJ for their position are that Ignatov (right):

has no ties to the US;

possesses citizenship and has ties to countries with no extradition treaty with the US;

has plenty of international travel experience; and

has access to “massive foreign financial resources” (read: stolen OneCoin investor funds).

(Konstantin Ignatov) simply cannot be trusted to comply with any conditions set by the Court, having already lied to U.S. border agents, investigating case agents, and even the very Pretrial Services Officers tasked with evaluating appropriate bail in this case.

I had thought the proposed pre-trial release conditions suggested by Ignatov were pretty strong, but there were some caveats.

Namely that Ignatov would apparently be funding his pre-trial release with stolen OneCoin investor funds, and that his supporters were likely all beneficiaries of stolen OneCoin investor funds in one way or another.

On extradition, while Germany does have an extradition treaty with the US, under German law their citizens cannot be extradited to a foreign country.

This includes defendants that were arrested offshore and then later fled to Germany.

The DOJ also points out Dubai, which it states OneCoin has “significant ties to” and no extradition treaty with the US.

Finally, given that the OneCoin fraud scheme continues to operate to this day, and that the defendant recently traveled to the United States to participate in meetings related to the operation of OneCoin in this country, his release would also endanger the economic safety of the community.

As to Ignatov’s proposed release conditions, the DOJ states

a defendant’s lack of ties to the United States, and corresponding significant ties to foreign jurisdictions without extradition weigh heavily in favor of detention.

A defendant’s access to substantial financial resources may also weigh in favor of detention, especially when those assets are located abroad.

One of the key components of Ignatov’s pre-trial release bid is a self-funded apartment staffed by 24/7 armed security guards.

The DOJ equates the proposal to an “‘elaborate replicat(ion of) a detention facility without the confidence of security such a facility instills.”

The guards themselves have a conflict of interest, as they are being paid by the inmate they are guarding.

Ignatov’s armed guards would also not be accountable to the government should he escape.

Additionally, courts in this district and other districts have denied virtual private jail solutions and ordered detention where defendants have
failed to reveal how the arrangements would be funded.

No doubt it’ll be hidden behind a slew of shell company transactions, but at the end of the day the Ignatov family has been living off OneCoin investors f

🤖 Quick Answer

Why is the DOJ opposing Konstantin Ignatov's pre-trial release?
The Department of Justice argues that no bail conditions can guarantee Ignatov's compliance, citing his lack of US ties, citizenship in countries without US extradition treaties, extensive international travel experience, and access to substantial foreign funds allegedly derived from OneCoin fraud proceeds.

What are the main concerns about Ignatov's reliability?
Prosecutors contend that Ignatov cannot be trusted to follow court conditions, having previously provided false statements to US border agents, investigating officers, and pretrial services personnel responsible for assessing appropriate bail arrangements in the case.

🔗 Related Articles

- BitClub Network’s Russ Medlin still at large
- DOJ filing suggests BitConnect promoters facing indictment
- DOJ maintains Weeks an “unreasonable flight risk”
- Jason Cardiff forfeits $530,000 bail bond
- Juan Carlos Reynoso denied OmegaPro pretrial release