The case against the first of OneCoin insider to fall, Mark Scott, is slowly progressing towards trial.
At present there’s a bit of a standoff regarding an agreed trial date.
The DOJ want a trial on or around September 2019. Mark Scott’s attorneys want July.
The court has previously ordered the parties to convene and sort it out.
As per a filed March 8th letter by the DOJ however, the issue remains unresolved.
In favor of a September’ish trial, the DOJ argue they have to go through “a voluminous amount of digital data”.
At present the seven terabytes of data is being sifted through to exclude privileged information, meaning the DOJ hasn’t even started on it yet.
Furthermore what data has been sorted is already causing disagreements between Scott’s legal team and the DOJ.
One point of contention is a “clients and attorneys list”, which Scott doesn’t want shared with the prosecution team.
The DOJ have taken the position the information is non-privileged and should be turned over.
The team sorting through the data meanwhile has informed the DOJ that the list itself ‘
is far too broad to effectively segregate nonprivileged materials
‘.
As a result, the Privilege Team is attempting to engage the defense in a dialogue about narrowing the Client List.
Indeed, the defense’s position means that the Privilege Team could not even provide a privilege log to the prosecution team
because such logs routinely identify the names of the clients involved in the communications being withheld.
Given there’s a guaranteed probability that names on that list are going to be OneCoin related, you can appreciate why the DOJ wants it turned over.
Without the list, the DOJ argue they won’t be able to file ‘
certain appropriate pre-trial motions.
‘
Specifically, the Government intends to submit a crime fraud motion regarding certain communications between the defendant and his co-conspirators.
However, the Government will be unable to file that motion until the prosecution team gains access to non-privileged materials, a privilege log of materials withheld, and the client list.
The DOJ raises a second argument against a July trial date, pertaining to the coordination of international witnesses.
The Government currently anticipates calling several international witnesses, including potential witnesses from the United Kingdom, Ireland, and the Cayman Islands.
These individuals are critical witnesses for the Government’s case-in-chief at trial.
The Government expects the evidence at trial to show that Scott set up a series of hedge funds registered abroad with accounts at banks located in the Cayman Islands in order to launder OneCoin proceeds.
Furthermore, Scott transferred a significant portion of the funds to related accounts at banks in the Republic of Ireland.
The Government will very likely call witnesses from these financial institutions, as well as other witnesses who reside overseas.
The appearance of these witnesses for testimony at trial will r
🤖 Quick Answer
What is the status of the Mark Scott OneCoin trial date?The Department of Justice is pushing for a September 2019 trial date, while Mark Scott's legal team advocates for July. The court previously ordered both parties to reach an agreement. As of March 8th, the dispute remains unresolved due to the extensive volume of digital evidence requiring processing and review before trial preparation can commence.
Why is the DOJ requesting a September 2019 trial date?
The DOJ argues that a September timeline is necessary to adequately process seven terabytes of digital data. This data must be reviewed to exclude privileged information before analysis can begin. Additionally, disagreements have already emerged between Scott's attorneys and prosecutors regarding the discovered evidence material.
🔗 Related Articles
- Eddy Alexandre’s initial court appearance and what’s next
- $17.9 mill DFRF final judgment, Heribeto Valdes up for $1.2 mill
- Barnes shows cause with ignorance and disease
- Michael Faust’s Project Lantern Ponzi collapses
- BLQ Football collapses, withdrawals disabled & fake SEC letter