Achieve Community, a purported investment platform, recently faced a significant setback when its claimed new payment processor, Global Cash Card (GCC), publicly denied any affiliation. The revelation came after an Achieve Community affiliate directly contacted GCC, contradicting the platform's December 18, 2014 announcement that named GCC as its new financial partner. This left Achieve Community without a processing solution and intensified questions about its operational future and regulatory standing.
The affiliate's inquiry to GCC concerned the shipment of debit cards to India, a service Payoneer had previously declined due to local regulations. Joe Purcell, a representative from Global Cash Card, responded unequivocally: "The Achieve Community is not a client of Global Cash Card." When presented with a screenshot of Achieve's announcement, Purcell's reply was even more direct, stating, "We have decided not to service them. they are aware." This exchange, once made public by the affiliate, forced Achieve Community's hand.
Kristi Johnson, the figurehead for Achieve Community, had apparently been aware of GCC's rejection before the public disclosure. On December 31st, Johnson issued an unusual administrative update, instructing affiliates to cease posting about Achieve Community on Facebook. She stated, "We are no longer able to be a Facebook program – and that is not up for debate – there are several reasons for this – and most have to do with our processors." This move appears to have been a damage control effort. Johnson likely sought to remove public claims, such as those promising 800% returns on investment, from social media platforms, hoping to present a cleaner image to future potential processors or regulators. Such exaggerated claims are a common red flag for financial institutions conducting due diligence.
Johnson's subsequent announcement confirmed GCC's refusal and indicated Achieve Community would require a complete organizational "restructuring." She claimed she would not understand the full implications until consulting with legal counsel. "All I can tell you is that I fully intend to have us up and running again as soon as possible and that I know there are many options for doing this. But at this point I need expert advice and I'm not going to guess at what that will be," Johnson stated. This situation mirrors a previous incident where Payoneer terminated its account with Achieve Community months prior, suggesting a pattern of difficulties in securing legitimate financial services.
A competent legal team would likely advise Johnson that operating a scheme that pays existing investors with funds from new investors constitutes an illegal Ponzi scheme, regardless of any accompanying product or service. The inclusion of "advertising banners" or other offerings does not alter the fundamental illegality if the underlying financial model relies on a constant influx of new capital to sustain payouts. Without a verifiable external revenue stream, the structure remains inherently non-compliant with financial regulations governing investment products and consumer protection laws. Regulators like the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) or state securities divisions would scrutinize such operations for unregistered securities offerings and fraud.
The repeated failures to secure payment processors highlight a fundamental issue with Achieve Community's business model. Legitimate payment processors conduct extensive due diligence to assess the legality and financial risk of their clients. They typically avoid high-risk ventures associated with multi-level marketing (MLM) or investment programs that show signs of being pyramid or Ponzi schemes. The reputational and regulatory risks for processors partnering with such entities are substantial, often involving potential exposure to anti-money laundering (AML) violations or facilitating fraudulent transactions. The "800% ROI" claims, coupled with the lack of transparency about an actual product or service generating revenue, would immediately flag the operation as high-risk.
Johnson's insistence that "Achieve is not going anywhere, no matter what we have to do" and her defiant declaration, "Nothing is going to stop me. This Community is changing the world and we aren't going to let a few set backs stop that," suggest an intent to continue operations despite the legal and financial obstacles. However, the most logical and legally sound action in such circumstances would be to issue immediate refunds to all investors. This course of action appears unlikely, given that funds from earlier participants have typically been siphoned off by administrators and early investors in schemes of this nature. This leaves little capital to repay later participants, creating a situation where Johnson must maintain the appearance of viability to avoid admitting the inability to issue refunds. Victims of such schemes often face a near-total loss of their investments, with recovery efforts proving complex and lengthy, frequently involving civil litigation or cooperation with law enforcement.
Johnson has promised further updates following her meeting with legal counsel. The outcome will likely determine whether Achieve Community attempts a genuine structural overhaul to achieve regulatory compliance or simply repackages the same underlying mechanics under a new guise, continuing to operate outside established financial regulations.