In the aftermath of the
preliminary injunction
granted against Traffic Monsoon and owner Charles Scoville, donations to Scoville’s legal fund appear to have tanked.

As per the “Scoville Legal Defense Fund” website, $1520 has been donated as of March 31, 2017.

Legal costs for February, 2017 were $4840. Legal costs for March have not been disclosed.

Evidently Scoville and his mother have been doing the rounds on Facebook, pressuring top Traffic Monsoon investors to ramp up donation collection efforts.

This didn’t sit well with Sunil Patel, which purportedly prompted Scoville to “cross the line” on a private Traffic Monsoon WhatsApp group.

In an audio clip that surfaced yesterday, Patel (right) doesn’t go into specific details of what Scoville allegedly posted.

[00:30] I was deeply insulted by what Charles wrote earlier. It really, really, really, really hurt me.

He does however suggest Scoville might have taken a dig at Patel’s efforts to collect affidavits from Traffic Monsoon investors in the wake of the SEC’s complaint.

[00:37] The affidavits were useful. Every person who done a notarized affidavit could go to prison for perjury for doing that, right?

[11:50] You’ve put this message in the WhatsApp group today and you’ve just ruined our whole relationship, Charles.

You have ruined our relationship because I can’t come back from that type of hatred you put in there.

The affidavits, the Revolution Day, about me eating ice cream on the beach… you’ve disrespected me now Charles. You’ve stepped over the mark.

[14:09] Your message that you put in the leader’s WhatsApp group, I can’t forgive you for that.

The primary reason Scoville derided Patel appears to be related to his lack of enthusiasm to solicit donations for Scoville’s defense fund.

[00:58] I didn’t reply to Charles’ message in his group, but now it’s four o’clock in the morning and Charles is messaging me saying, “Sunil I need your help, can you get some donations going? You’ve got a big following, why don’t you do something? blahblahblahblahblah”.

[4:48] You insulted me with that message earlier Charles, right? And you said, “Oh you know you’ve got all the people saying “like”, “unity”, “you’ve got all the people together but you’re not … helping with the funding”.

[01:25] From the beginning I have hated doing everything else I’ve done for TM, but I’ve hated collecting donations.

The main reason I don’t like collecting donations is because everyone has lost enough money.

Patel also claims he didn’t approve posts from Scoville and his mother soliciting donations in his Traffic Monsoon Facebook group.

The narrative pushed by Scoville to solicit donations is that if Traffic Monsoon wins the SEC case, ROI payouts will resume. This despite forensic accounting revealing seized funds are nowhere near enough to pay out Traffic Monsoon investors.

As a Traffic Monsoon insider, this appears to have ground on Patel’s conscience – because he believes Scoville isn’t as broke as he m

🤖 Quick Answer

What was the status of Traffic Monsoon's legal defense fund as of March 31, 2017?
The Scoville Legal Defense Fund had collected only $1,520 by March 31, 2017, following a preliminary injunction against Traffic Monsoon and its owner Charles Scoville. Legal expenses for February 2017 totaled $4,840, indicating a significant shortfall between donations received and costs incurred.

Who raised concerns about Charles Scoville's conduct on social media?
Sunil Patel, a prominent Traffic Monsoon investor, objected to Scoville's activities on Facebook where Scoville and his mother were pressuring top investors to increase donations. Patel's concerns allegedly prompted Scoville to post inappropriate content on a private WhatsApp group.

🔗 Related Articles

- Scoville loses control of Traffic Monsoon, Receiver appointed
- OneCoin class-action Plaintiffs file for voluntary dismissal
- Prolific MLM scammer Anthony Norman arrested in Sweden
- MLM Ponzi pimp updates, July 16th 2014
- PayPal sued for facilitating Traffic Monsoon Ponzi fraud