On November 26th the Tenth Circuit dismissed Charles Scoville’s second filed Traffic Monsoon appeal.

Scoville filed the
seemingly pointless second appeal
back in March 2018.

The appeal was
denied
back in January this year. On November 26th the Tenth Circuit dismissed the case, effectively clearing the appeal as an administrative obstacle.

This was done following the
rejection of Scoville’s Supreme Court writ
.

The original Tenth Circuit appeal docket records the Supreme Court writ decision on November 4th.

That case also went against Scoville, but was stayed pending the outcome of the Supreme Court writ decision.

With the denial of the SCOTUS writ, the Tenth Circuit’s decision is executed. This means that the
preliminary injunction
stands the case is kicked back to the Utah District Court.

As at the time of publication, the last entry on the Utah case docket is dated November 26th.

The entry records a motion to voluntarily dismiss an appeal, supposedly filed by Scoville.

With both known appeals filed by Scoville dealt with, I’m not really sure what this filing pertains to. Perhaps the original appeal, which has yet to show any progress beyond acknowledgement of the SCOTUS writ decision.

In any event it’s expected the case has resumed in the Utah District Court, so that’s what we’ll be tracking going forward.

In related Traffic Monsoon news, the Receiver has informed the court of her intent to subpoena Santander Holdings.

Santander Holdings owns Santander Bank, a retail bank that operates in the US.

The Receiver is requesting “all documents and other materials” pertaining to a specific Santander Bank account. Any additional information on accounts held by or in Charles Scoville are also requested.

Sought information on the account(s) includes;

(a) copies of all monthly account statements;

(b) copies of the fronts and backs of all checks;

(c) copies of all Documents evidencing all deposits and withdrawals, including “eDeposits”; and

(d) copies of all signature cards or other Documents evidencing ownership or signing authority.

As of yet the context of the sought information is unknown. One possibility is the requested information pertains to
Scoville’s London flat sale mystery
.

Stay tuned…

🤖 Quick Answer

What happened to Charles Scoville's second Traffic Monsoon appeal?
On November 26th, the Tenth Circuit dismissed Charles Scoville's second appeal filed in March 2018. The dismissal followed the rejection of his Supreme Court writ petition in November. The preliminary injunction now stands, and the case returns to the Utah District Court for further proceedings regarding the receiver's authority.

Why was the second appeal considered pointless?
The second appeal was deemed seemingly pointless because the first Tenth Circuit appeal had already been denied in January. Filing a second appeal on similar grounds, without substantial new legal arguments or circumstances, provided no meaningful basis for reconsideration or reversal of the court's previous decision.

What is the significance of the preliminary injunction standing?
The preliminary injunction standing means the receiver's authority over Traffic Monsoon assets remains in effect. This allows the receiver to continue managing company affairs

🔗 Related Articles

- Swiss Gold Global Review v2.0: Securities and recruitment
- MGH Global Vision Review: Anti-cancer & matrix recruitment
- SEC use Sloan’s post TelexFree activity against her
- SEC: Traffic Monsoon does not have sufficient funds to repay investors
- Charles Scoville vows to fight Traffic Monsoon Ponzi case