A February 21st order has revealed a decision on the Success By Health preliminary injunction is likely next week.
The note was part of an order granting Success By Health’s motion to supplement the record:
The Court is considering the newly-submitted evidence and hopes to issue an order on the merits of the preliminary injunction request sometime next week.
As to Success By Health’s motion, on February 19th the company flooded the docket with twenty-four supplementary exhibits.
The FTC didn’t oppose the filing, but did state the exhibits were
replete with factual inaccuracies, are contradicted by Defendants’ sworn testimony, and largely reflect information that could have been submitted prior to or during the Court’s February 12 hearing.
None of the new material undercuts the FTC’s voluminous evidence establishing a likelihood of success on the merits and that the equities favor granting a preliminary injunction.
A decision on the injunction remains pending.
Update 29th February 2020 –
On February 27th a
preliminary injunction was granted
against Success By Health and Jay Noland.
🤖 Quick Answer
When is the Success By Health preliminary injunction decision expected?A federal court order from February 21st indicates that a decision on Success By Health's preliminary injunction request will likely be issued next week. The court stated it is reviewing newly-submitted evidence and supplementary exhibits before ruling on the merits of the case.
What did Success By Health submit to the court?
Success By Health filed twenty-four supplementary exhibits on February 19th to supplement the case record. The FTC challenged the submission, arguing the materials contained factual inaccuracies and contradicted defendants' sworn testimony, claiming most information could have been presented earlier.
🔗 Related Articles
- Success by Health seeks reversal of preliminary injunction
- FTC files for new Success by Health preliminary injunction
- Brandon Frye cops $600,000 DIS default judgment
- Cardiffs denied stay, Poujade up for contempt & trial date
- Cardiffs allege fraud occurred prior to preliminary injunction
