The Success By Health defendants have voluntarily withdrawn their injunction appeal.

No reason for the withdrawal was given, with the case docket only recording withdrawal was granted on December 14th.

Jay Noland and the rest of the Success By Health defendants filed their Ninth Circuit appeal on October 6th.

The appeal sought to overturn a September 23rd order,
denying the defendant’s’ motion to dissolve the granted preliminary injunction
.

Looking forward, the parties are in disagreement with respect to scheduling.

Among other things, Noland the SBH defendants argue the FTC has not complied with various FRCP rules. Thus a delay in scheduling a trial is not warranted.

The FTC filed its response on December 22nd, dismissing the SBH defendant’s arguments as “a grab bag of issues unrelated to trial scheduling”.

A decision on the scheduling dispute remains pending.

🤖 Quick Answer

What did the Success By Health defendants do regarding their injunction appeal?
The Success By Health defendants voluntarily withdrew their injunction appeal filed with the Ninth Circuit on October 6th. The withdrawal was granted on December 14th without disclosure of reasons. The appeal had previously sought to overturn a September 23rd order that denied the defendants' motion to dissolve a preliminary injunction.

What disagreement exists between the parties moving forward?
The parties disagree regarding trial scheduling. The Success By Health defendants and Jay Noland argue the FTC has not complied with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, contending that a delay in scheduling is unwarranted. The FTC filed a response on December 22nd, dismissing these arguments.

🔗 Related Articles

- Affiliates put $250K+ towards Success by Health’s legal costs
- Success By Health preliminary injunction granted, FTC wins
- Success by Health trial narrowed to Individual Defendants
- Success by Health seeks reversal of preliminary injunction
- Final Judgment granted against US Zeek Rewards net-winners