Sandra Gavel Loses $123,728 Judgment in Zeek Rewards Clawback Case
Sandra Gavel ignored her way into a $123,728 judgment.
The Canadian Zeek Rewards scammer faced clawback litigation from the Zeek Receiver and promptly made her first mistake: she wrote a letter to the court claiming she didn't consent to US jurisdiction. The court didn't buy it. Judges don't grant consent based on letters. The Receiver filed for clarification, and the court classified Gavel's filing as a pro se Motion to Dismiss and denied it outright. That was late 2015.
By early 2017, the Receiver was ready to move on. They filed for Summary Judgment against Gavel and waited.
Judge Mullen took roughly eight months to rule. On September 7th, he granted the Receiver's motion.
Gavel never responded. Not once. When the court sent her a Roseboro Order on February 27th—a standard notice giving defendants 34 days to respond to summary judgment—the letter came back undeliverable. Gavel ghosted the entire legal process.
The court made its position clear in the ruling: Gavel failed to respond to the motion. The facts and arguments the Receiver presented were sufficient to establish the claims. Summary Judgment was appropriate.
Gavel now owes $123,738. Of that, $89,904 represents money she stole directly from Zeek Rewards victims. The remaining $33,833 is prejudgment interest.
The judgment complicated an already messy situation. A trial for the remaining Canadian Zeek net-winners had been scheduled for October 17th, substantially delayed by Gavel's refusal to engage with the court. That trial never happened.
By November 1st, the entire case was marked terminated—the same day as Gavel's Summary Judgment order. What that means for the other Canadian victims waiting for their money remains unclear. The Receiver hasn't explained whether the case termination affects their claims or what comes next.
The silence continues.
🤖 Quick Answer
Who is Sandra Gavel and what legal judgment was issued against her?Sandra Gavel is a Canadian individual involved in the Zeek Rewards scheme who faced a $123,728 summary judgment from the Zeek Receiver. Judge Mullen granted the judgment on September 7th after Gavel failed to respond to the Receiver's motion, having previously rejected her pro se objections to US court jurisdiction.
What were the key procedural errors in Sandra Gavel's defense strategy?
Gavel's initial mistake was submitting a letter to court claiming non-consent to US jurisdiction, which judges do not accept as valid grounds. The court reclassified her filing as a pro se Motion to Dismiss and denied it. Subsequently, Gavel never responded to the Receiver's Summary Judgment motion, resulting in default judgment.
**What is the significance of the Zeek Rewards clawback
🔗 Related Articles
- Athene Network Ponzi sued for trademark infringement
- Zeek investor files batshit crazy response to default judgement
- Why Vemma hasn’t restarted business operations yet
- Talk Fusion terminate top ranked affiliates, lawsuit filed
- Abundance Network Review: Phone-based gifting scheme