OneCoin's Swedish Police Reprieve Was Short-Lived
OneCoin claimed victory last week. Swedish police had closed their investigation into the cryptocurrency scheme, the company announced, citing an unsourced "police statement" suggesting there was no basis to continue. The decision came down on March 1st, 2017, according to OneCoin's telling, but the company waited until March 16th to trumpet the news.
OneCoin's affiliates pounced. Here was proof of legitimacy, they shouted, conveniently ignoring the Ponzi business model staring everyone in the face, the regulatory ban in Italy, the monthly bank account closures throughout 2016, and warnings from over a dozen countries. Ted Nuyten reprinted the press release without mentioning any of that context. Press-release spammers flooded the internet with the good news.
Something felt off. The closure made no sense on its face. OneCoin operates like a textbook Ponzi scheme—newly invested funds flow in and get paid to existing investors. The pyramid layer sits on top, designed to keep new money coming. Any competent regulator examining the money trail would spot it immediately. So I waited for official confirmation before publishing anything.
That turned out to be the right call.
By March 17th, Swedish police had reopened the investigation.
The original closure announcement remained murky. A BehindMLM reader contacted the Swedish Gaming Board and got confirmation the investigation had indeed been closed, but the Gaming Board themselves had no idea why. The police officer in charge wouldn't answer calls about the decision.
The Gaming Board's own preliminary investigation had concluded in early 2016 that OneCoin was a pyramid scheme. They referred the case to police for further investigation. Now, without explanation, that police investigation had been shut down. And just as mysteriously, it was back on.
The broader picture explains the confusion. OneCoin operates out of Bulgaria, and even then, money moves through shell companies tied to entities nobody can pin down. Bulgarian authorities have given no public indication they consider Ponzi fraud concerning. European regulators, outside Italy's recent exception, face real limits. They can issue warnings. That's largely it.
An unsourced police statement claiming no offense occurred simply didn't square with what European authorities already knew. Italy had banned the scheme. Money was flowing in ways that screamed criminal enterprise. The Gaming Board had explicitly identified it as a pyramid scheme.
When the Swedish police suddenly reversed course and reopened the investigation, nobody was surprised except OneCoin. The company had spent days celebrating a reprieve that was never solid. Their press release parade had been premature.
What happened in those few days between March 1st and March 17th remains unclear. Whether someone asked questions, whether regulators compared notes across borders, whether the closure was actually issued under false pretenses—those details haven't surfaced. What's clear is OneCoin's ability to manufacture legitimacy out of thin air collapsed almost as quickly as it was built.
🤖 Quick Answer
Was the Swedish police investigation into OneCoin actually closed in March 2017?
The Swedish police investigation closure announced by OneCoin on March 16th, 2017, proved temporary. OneCoin cited an unsourced police statement claiming insufficient basis for continuation. However, the investigation resumed on March 17th, the day after the company's announcement, contradicting OneCoin's claims of vindication and legitimacy.
What context did OneCoin affiliates omit when celebrating the investigation closure?
OneCoin promoters ignored critical information when announcing the investigation's closure. They disregarded documented Ponzi scheme characteristics, regulatory bans in Italy, frequent 2016 bank account closures, and official warnings issued by over a dozen countries regarding the cryptocurrency venture.
🔗 Related Articles
- Eagle Gates Group’s Eddy McClough still at large, D. Keller trial date
- Zater Capital Review: Ron Cartey’s AI trading bot Ponzi
- Scammers resurrect Traffic Monsoon Ponzi, again
- Sean Robertson sues Blue Ocean Society owners
- BitNest collapses, desperate node Ponzi reboots