OneCoin is fighting back against journalists with legal threats just as police turn up the heat on the cryptocurrency scheme.

The City of London Police's Economic Crime Directorate has launched a formal investigation into OneCoin on suspicion of fraud, The Mirror reported this week. The directorate, which serves as the national policing lead for fraud investigations, confirmed detectives are actively looking into the scheme.

But OneCoin isn't sitting idle. The company hired Carter-Ruck, a prominent UK law firm specializing in media law and commercial disputes, to push back against reporting. Last month, the firm sent a cease and desist letter to a freelance journalist covering OneCoin, warning them to stop publishing fraud allegations.

The letter, marked "private and confidential, not for publication," was blunt. "The claims made in the publications upon which you rely are not accepted, most notably the claim that our client's business is a 'fraudulent ponzi scheme'," Carter-Ruck wrote on OneCoin's behalf. The firm added there was "no public interest in the repetition of allegations which you have been put on notice are false."

It's a curious legal position. OneCoin's business model relies on recruiting new investors whose money flows to earlier participants—the textbook definition of a Ponzi scheme. Carter-Ruck's letter doesn't explain how this mechanism differs from the fraudulent structure it denies. Whether the freelancer complied with the legal threat remains unknown.

Carter-Ruck's denial of police contact also raises eyebrows. When The Mirror broke news of the investigation, a spokesman for OneCoin's lawyers claimed "neither the FCA nor the City of London Police have contacted our clients." This statement came even as the police directorate confirmed its investigation was underway.

The aggressive legal posturing fits a broader pattern. OneCoin has faced mounting scrutiny from regulators worldwide. The scheme promised cryptocurrency riches but delivered little more than recruitment requirements and inflated valuations. Investors who tried to cash out discovered their coins had no real market value.

Silencing journalists through legal intimidation is a standard tactic for schemes trying to buy time. But with police now formally investigating, legal letters to reporters do little to address the core allegations. The Economic Crime Directorate's involvement suggests investigators have already found enough evidence to warrant a full-scale inquiry.

For OneCoin, the timing is brutal. Just as the police investigation breaks into mainstream media, the company is burning resources on cease and desist letters to journalists covering the story. It's a backwards strategy—one that typically signals an operation running out of options.

The freelancer journalist who received OneCoin's legal threat faced a familiar choice: comply with demands to stop reporting, or continue publishing despite the legal pressure. Either way, the police investigation moves forward independently. No law firm letter changes what detectives find in their files.

🤖 Quick Answer

What legal action did OneCoin take against journalists reporting on the scheme?
OneCoin hired Carter-Ruck, a prominent UK law firm specializing in media law, to issue cease and desist letters to journalists covering the cryptocurrency scheme. The firm warned a freelance journalist to cease publishing fraud allegations against OneCoin, marking an aggressive legal strategy amid ongoing police investigations.

Why did the City of London Police investigate OneCoin?
The City of London Police's Economic Crime Directorate launched a formal investigation into OneCoin on suspicion of fraud. As the national policing lead for fraud investigations, the directorate actively examined the cryptocurrency scheme following public reports of fraudulent activities associated with the company.

How did OneCoin respond to police scrutiny and media coverage?
OneCoin engaged Carter-Ruck law firm to counter journalists' reporting through legal threats and cease and desist letters. This defensive strategy aimed to

🔗 Related Articles

- Validus Ponzi permanently banned in New Zealand
- Brent Willis settles NewAge fraud with SEC for $175,000
- Bitcaw Trading threatens to sue Hawks over BTC Global Team assoc.
- Herbalife continue to dodge retail in LULAC response
- Vault27 Review: “Soft KYC” staking MLM crypto Ponzi