Nu Skin Paid Off Chinese Officials to Kill Pyramid Scheme Investigation
Nu Skin executives knew exactly what they were doing when they funneled $154,000 to a Chinese charity in 2013. They were buying silence from a Communist Party official to bury an investigation into their illegal operations.
The company's American parent admitted as much in a settlement with the SEC announced this week, agreeing to pay $765,688 and accept charges that it violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. What started as a routine compliance check spiraled into one of the clearest cases of corporate bribery in recent memory.
Here's how it went down. In 2013, Nu Skin China held an unauthorized sales meeting in a city where it had no license to operate and no physical storefront. When local authorities from the Administration of Industry and Commerce showed up and shut it down, they launched a full investigation into the company's direct selling practices.
The provincial agency came back with damning findings. It had gathered enough evidence to prove Nu Skin violated Chinese direct selling laws. The investigation was going to cost the company real money, real damage to its reputation, maybe even expulsion from the market.
So Nu Skin China did what apparently made sense to its executives: they bribed the problem away.
A Nu Skin employee reached out to a high-ranking Communist Party official he knew personally. The pitch was simple. Nu Skin would donate one million yuan—about $154,000—to a charity in the official's province. In exchange, the investigation would disappear.
The money moved. The official's influence worked. The investigation quietly went away.
But Nu Skin's accounting department had a problem. They needed to explain the $154,000 transfer on the company's books. Rather than admit what it was, they labeled it a charitable donation. Clean. Legitimate. Completely false.
The deception held up until 2014, when news leaked that Chinese authorities were calling Nu Skin a pyramid scheme. That's when the SEC's ears perked up. An investigation began, though Nu Skin's CEO insisted at the time he had no idea what the SEC was looking into. By mid-2015, the company finally acknowledged it knew about the probe—claiming it only found out in April, a convenient detail that strains credulity.
The SEC filed cease-and-desist charges against Nu Skin in September 2016. Rather than fight, the company immediately surrendered and negotiated a settlement.
In the settlement, Nu Skin admitted it failed to maintain adequate internal controls over its Chinese subsidiary. It admitted the charity payment was improper. It admitted falsifying its books and records. It admitted violating the FCPA's anti-corruption provisions.
The $765,688 fine is a rounding error for a company that generates billions in annual revenue. For Nu Skin, it's just the cost of doing business in a market where cash-and-corruption solutions are faster than compliance.
🤖 Quick Answer
What was Nu Skin's involvement in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act violation?Nu Skin funneled $154,000 to a Chinese charity in 2013 to silence a Communist Party official investigating the company's illegal pyramid scheme operations. The SEC settlement required Nu Skin to pay $765,688 and accept FCPA violation charges for this bribery scheme.
How did Nu Skin's unlicensed operations trigger the corruption investigation?
Nu Skin China conducted an unauthorized sales meeting in a city where it lacked operating licenses and physical presence. When local authorities discovered these violations, company executives bribed officials with charitable donations to bury the investigation rather than face regulatory consequences.
What financial penalties did Nu Skin face in the SEC settlement?
Nu Skin agreed to pay $765,688 in the settlement announced by the SEC. This penalty addressed violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act resulting
🔗 Related Articles
- Swiss Gold Global Review v2.0: Securities and recruitment
- Ascendra Review: AIM Global scammers launch own pyramid
- SEC granted TRO against TelexFree, hearing set
- OXI Corp Review: 10% a day “we do everything” Ponzi
- SEC use Sloan’s post TelexFree activity against her