NewULife is fighting back against a defamation lawsuit by invoking California's anti-SLAPP statute, a legal tool designed to stop frivolous cases aimed at silencing free speech.

Awakend filed the lawsuit on December 23rd, 2022, accusing NewULife and its founder and CEO Alexy Goldstein of defamation, tortious interference, breach of contract, and civil conspiracy. The complaint targets statements made in YouTube videos, blog articles, and social media posts about Awakend, a multi-level marketing opportunity launched by former NewULife employee Danelle Meoli and her business partner Rodney James.

NewULife's anti-SLAPP motion argues that Awakend is attempting to punish them for protected speech on matters of public interest. To succeed on such a motion, NewULife must first demonstrate that the lawsuit stems from conduct protected by free speech rights. The company contends that the statements at issue were made in public forums and addressed issues of legitimate public concern.

"Claims within the Complaint arise from statements or writings made in a place open to the public or a public forum in connection with an issue of public interest," NewULife's filing states. The company goes further, arguing that even if the statements were defamatory, each claim fails on the merits and the entire complaint should be struck.

The dispute centers on Meoli's departure from NewULife. According to the company's filing, Meoli was terminated for violating company policies. She and NewULife reached a settlement agreement that included a non-disparagement clause. But Meoli and James couldn't resist attacking the company through their new business venture's legal filings.

Awakend alleges that NewULife orchestrated a coordinated campaign to destroy the fledgling MLM by spreading false information online. The complaint is light on specifics, claiming only that NewULife conspired to distribute false statements across various digital platforms.

NewULife denies involvement entirely. The company insists it had nothing to do with the YouTube videos, blog posts, or social media messages cited in the complaint. Those materials, NewULife argues, came from unrelated third parties acting independently.

This distinction matters legally. If NewULife didn't create or control the allegedly defamatory content, Awakend's conspiracy claim falls apart. NewULife's lawyers are betting that Awakend's sparse allegations won't survive judicial scrutiny, particularly when the company is explicitly invoking protected speech rights under California law.

The anti-SLAPP statute exists precisely for situations like this: when a plaintiff uses litigation to punish someone for speaking publicly about matters of public interest. If NewULife succeeds in its motion to strike, the lawsuit could be dismissed before it ever reaches trial. If it fails, the case moves forward and NewULife must defend against the substantive claims of defamation and conspiracy.

🤖 Quick Answer

What is an anti-SLAPP statute and how does it function in California law?
An anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation) statute is a legal mechanism designed to dismiss frivolous lawsuits targeting protected speech. California's version allows defendants to file motions eliminating cases based on statements addressing matters of public interest, protecting free speech rights before costly litigation proceeds.

Why did NewULife file an anti-SLAPP response to Awakend's lawsuit?
NewULife invoked the anti-SLAPP statute to challenge Awakend's defamation claims, arguing the lawsuit represents an attempt to silence protected speech. The company contends that statements made in YouTube videos, blog articles, and social media posts addressed matters of public interest regarding Awakend's multi-level marketing business model.

What allegations did Awakend include in its December 2022 complaint?
Awakend

🔗 Related Articles

- The Traders Domain Receiver files clawback lawsuits
- FinMore collapses, Nelo Life “complete distraction” blamed
- Awakend sues NewULife & Alexy Goldstein for defamation
- Jeunesse RICO settlement appeal hits $70,000 roadblock
- Sol People Review: Awakend reboots with new execs