Lado Okhotnikov is trapping investors in his latest scam, and he's doing it with the same playbook he's used before.
The fugitive operator—wanted by US authorities—continues running MetaForce from Georgia, a rebranded version of his notorious Forsage Ponzi scheme. When investors tried to move their NFTs to his newest iteration in late May, Okhotnikov threw up a wall. Thousands of people found their digital assets frozen, locked behind accusations of cheating that conveniently blocked them from cashing out.
Okhotnikov's story kept changing. First, he claimed MetaForce investors had purchased "artificially cheated" NFTs using "twisted" tokens, so he blacklisted them. The problem with this narrative? MetaForce was the only entity selling the NFTs in the first place. When users attempted to migrate their holdings, they hit a pop-up: "transferring the NFT is not possible."
A week later, Okhotnikov doubled down. He announced "drastic measures" to address what he called scammers who had "artificially cheated" the system. His team had written scripts, he explained, to identify and flag dubious accounts. But then came the admission buried in his own statement: the NFTs were so mixed up that it became impossible to separate legitimate holdings from suspicious ones because investors had bought, merged, and traded them together.
Enter the con within the con. Okhotnikov introduced "NFT reputation"—a system designed to charge additional fees to anyone whose holdings fell below perfect status. Clean NFTs meant zero fees. But most investors found their reputation tanked. They faced two choices: pay money to upgrade their reputation to 100 percent, or exchange their NFTs for new ones and cover the difference out of pocket.
The scheme worked exactly as designed. As panicked investors rushed to sell their holdings on OpenSea over the final days of May, Okhotnikov spotted the exit ramp closing. NFTs flooded the market, prices collapsed, and he released another statement claiming "legal" Royalty NFTs couldn't possibly be that cheap. He promised segregation, vowing to leave participants with what they deserved—though his track record suggested otherwise.
This isn't Okhotnikov's first rodeo with collapsing schemes. Forsage, his original operation, spawned multiple versions before MetaForce launched as a near-identical clone. When that version crumbled after months, he simply reloaded with fresh branding and the same mechanics: recruit investors, sell them digital assets, then block their withdrawals when they demand their money back.
What Okhotnikov has mastered is the art of the pivot. Each time his operation faces pressure, he launches a new version while manufacturing reasons to freeze assets. The accusations change, but the result stays consistent: investors are locked out of their holdings, forced to pay additional fees or accept losses, while Okhotnikov maintains operational control from a jurisdiction that hasn't extradited him.
For the investors trapped in MetaForce, the question is no longer if they'll lose money. It's how much Okhotnikov will extract before they finally walk away.
🤖 Quick Answer
Who is Lado Okhotnikov and what is MetaForce?Lado Okhotnikov is a fugitive operator wanted by US authorities who manages MetaForce from Georgia, a rebranded version of his previous Forsage Ponzi scheme. MetaForce operates an NFT-based investment platform where participants purchase digital assets.
Why did MetaForce blacklist investors in May?
MetaForce blacklisted thousands of investors attempting to transfer their NFTs, claiming they had purchased "artificially cheated" NFTs using "twisted" tokens. The blacklisting prevented affected users from accessing and cashing out their digital assets.
What is the contradiction in Okhotnikov's explanation?
Okhotnikov claimed investors purchased fraudulent NFTs, yet MetaForce was the sole entity selling these NFTs. This contradiction suggests the blacklisting served purposes beyond the stated just
🔗 Related Articles
- Holiguards, the Forsage Ponzi movie directed by… Kevin Spacey?
- Carnelian12 Ponzi collapses, withdrawals unpaid for 2 weeks
- CashFX Group sets up BullnBear Pay to pay withdrawals
- MainetX Review: Ciprian Ciceu’s fifth Ponzi reboot
- Daniel Tay admits uFun Club illegal, 11th arrest in Thailand
