Matt Lloyd McPhee won't walk away from his Malaysian luxury condos, Fijian island, and Costa Rican resort—and that refusal just tanked his settlement with the FTC.
The fight is heating up in federal court. Lloyd filed an answer to the FTC's massive lawsuit against him weeks late, after the agency had already won a default judgment. He then asked the court to throw out that default. The FTC fired back with an opposition that lays bare exactly why these two sides can't make a deal.
Settlement talks started off civil enough. The FTC extended Lloyd's deadline to respond multiple times. They even released $50,000 to him specifically so he could pay lawyers to work on negotiations. For months, both sides appeared serious about reaching an agreement.
Then the conversation turned to Lloyd's properties.
The FTC made clear: those assets—the condos, the island, the resort—were bought with stolen consumer money. They wanted Lloyd to hand over his rights to everything. That's when Lloyd dug in.
He'd only agree if the court-appointed receiver couldn't sell the properties. The FTC countered with a carrot: agree to liquidation and they'd partially suspend the monetary judgment against him. Lloyd wanted more. He asked for additional funds from the Receiver to cover legal bills.
The FTC refused. Receivership money, they said, belonged to victims. No more cash would leave that account unless it put the Receivership in a surplus.
By late November, the two sides had hit a wall. Lloyd's own attorneys quit on December 10th. Five days later, despite being told point-blank that no additional funds were coming, Lloyd demanded $35,000 for attorney fees anyway.
The FTC is now arguing the court should keep the default judgment in place. Lloyd provided no excuse for blowing past his filing deadline and has raised no actual defense to the lawsuit, they contend. Setting aside the default this late would also drag things out and hurt consumers still waiting for restitution.
The court will decide whether to accept Lloyd's late answer. But the settlement collapse tells you everything: Lloyd was willing to negotiate his way out of trouble, just not if it meant losing the lifestyle those allegedly ill-gotten gains bought him.
🤖 Quick Answer
Who is Matt Lloyd McPhee and what is his legal dispute with the FTC?Matt Lloyd McPhee is a defendant in a significant Federal Trade Commission lawsuit. He is disputing the agency's claims while refusing to surrender substantial assets including Malaysian luxury condominiums, a Fijian island property, and a Costa Rican resort, which has complicated settlement negotiations between both parties.
Why did Matt Lloyd's FTC settlement negotiations fail?
Settlement discussions collapsed over Lloyd's unwillingness to relinquish his overseas properties and assets. Despite the FTC's good-faith efforts, including releasing fifty thousand dollars for his legal representation and extending multiple response deadlines, Lloyd's refusal to surrender the luxury properties became an insurmountable obstacle to reaching agreement.
What procedural complications arose in Lloyd's case?
Lloyd filed his answer to the FTC's lawsuit significantly late, after the agency obtained a default judgment against him
🔗 Related Articles
- Espirito Santo’s IRS fines TelexFree R$70 million
- Massachusetts charge TelexFree as “billion dollar Ponzi”
- Dept of Homeland Security raid TelexFree office
- Brazil indicts twenty-two TelexFree scammers
- TelexFree laundered funds through shell companies