On January 8th Jeunesse filed a lawsuit against former President, Darren Jensen.
In their lawsuit Jeunesse accused Jensen of raiding the company to build
LifeVantage
, of which Jensen is currently President and CEO.
Back in March Jeunesse’s lawsuit was referred to mediation, with a report on mediation developments held on August 26th.
As per the report, a mediation conference was held between Jeunesse and Jensen (right) on August 25th.
The report notes that ‘
the case has been completely settled
‘.
A Notice of Settlement filed three days later on August 29th advised
the parties are finalizing a settlement.
Upon the finalization of the settlement, which is expected to occur in (sic) within the next sixty (60) days, the parties shall file a joint notice of voluntary dismissal with prejudice.
Judge Presnell appears to have ignored that last paragraph. Later that same day he issued an order dismissing Jeunesse’s case without prejudice.
Unfortunately the settlement is confidential, so details of how Jeunesse resolved their raiding claims against Darren Jensen are not public.
🤖 Quick Answer
What was the nature of the lawsuit filed by Jeunesse against Darren Jensen?Jeunesse accused its former President Darren Jensen of improperly raiding company resources to establish LifeVantage, where Jensen currently serves as President and CEO. The lawsuit sought to address alleged unauthorized transfer of assets and personnel to the competing company.
How was the dispute between Jeunesse and Jensen resolved?
The case proceeded to mediation in March following initial filing in January. A mediation conference held August 25th resulted in complete settlement. A Notice of Settlement filed August 29th confirmed the parties' agreement, with finalization expected within sixty days through joint voluntary dismissal.
🔗 Related Articles
- JRJR33 and Youngevity settle Spice Jazz fraud lawsuit
- Eaconomy alleged fraud lawsuits voluntarily dismissed
- Nutra Pharma Corp settles MyNyloxin fraud with SEC
- Nerium’s Dennis Windsor counterclaims settled with injunction
- Details of the Youngevity v. Wakaya Perfection settlement
