The Traders Domain defendants Holton Buggs and Robert Collazo have consented to preliminary injunctions.

Buggs’ consent is of particular significance as, up until very recently, he was set to raise
shameful arguments
in court.

Buggs’ preliminary injunction consent motion was filed on January 15th and approved later the same day. Collazo’s consent motion was filed and approved on January 9th.

The granted preliminary injunctions extend the asset freeze implemented by the previously granted TRO. Buggs and Collazo are also required to fully cooperate with the court-appointed The Traders Domain Receiver.

Other orders from the court since BehindMLM’s last The Traders Domain update include:

a motion for and court clerk’s entry of default against Traders Domain FX Ltd, Fredirick Teddy Joseph Safranko, William Negus-Romvari, Ares Global Ltd, Algo Capital LLC, Algo FX Capital Advisor LLC and Juan Herman on January 10th;

denial of Robert Collazo’s motion to dismiss on January 14th;

denial of Holton Buggs’ motion to dismiss on January 17th; and

all defendants ordered to file an answer to
the CFTC’s Complaint
by February 7th

A preliminary injunction hearing for the remaining The Traders Domain defendants was held as scheduled on January 24th.

As per the case docket entry;

A preliminary injunction shall be issued against Defendants Frederick “Teddy” Joseph Safranko, David Williams Negus-Romvari, and Juan “JJ” Herman. A written order will follow.

That order is expected sometime next week.

Update 27th April 2025 – 
Holton Buggs has entered into settlement negotiations with The Traders Domain Receivership.

As per the Receiver’s Third Status Report, filed on April 16th;

On April 8, 2025, Buggs’ counsel made a settlement proposal to the Receiver. The Receiver responded to the settlement offer and is currently awaiting the response from Buggs’ counsel.


🤖 Quick Answer

What did Holton Buggs and Robert Collazo consent to in the Traders Domain case?
Holton Buggs and Robert Collazo, defendants in the Traders Domain enforcement action, each consented to preliminary injunctions. Buggs' consent motion was filed and approved on January 15th, while Collazo's was filed and approved on January 9th. Both injunctions extended an existing asset freeze previously established through a temporary restraining order.

What are the key requirements imposed by the Traders Domain preliminary injunctions?
The granted preliminary injunctions extend the asset freeze originally implemented under the previously approved temporary restraining order. Additionally, both Holton Buggs and Robert Collazo are required to fully cooperate with the court-appointed Receiver overseeing The Traders Domain matter, ensuring compliance with all associated legal obligations.

**Why is Holton Buggs'


🔗 Related Articles

- 36 arrested in Ghana for “network marketing scamming”
- $669,000 in default judgements against Canadian net-winners
- Aljazeera America publish “in-depth look at MLM”
- Amplifei Review: Hapinss Brands supps w/ forced autoship
- GainBitcoin scammer Amit Bhardwaj dies of cardiac arrest?