The Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) confirmed today that the Solomon James writ 383 case, currently before the Supreme Court, will not impact its ongoing criminal investigations into Speak Asia. This clarification addresses widespread speculation among company panelists and follows months of public silence from the EOW regarding the writ's effect.

Many Speak Asia panelists believe the Supreme Court's decision on the writ will resolve all company issues, including criminal matters. They expect the court to determine whether Speak Asia's business operations can restart, despite active criminal investigations by agencies like the EOW and CID.

The EOW acknowledged the James writ 383 proceedings and its accompanying mediation process. An EOW spokesperson stated the writ "will not affect their case," adding that "even the SC has said that mediation is separate from the case."

Speak Asia has filed numerous cases against authorities in Raigad, Thane, AP, and Mumbai. These lawsuits aimed to halt criminal investigations into the company. Such actions suggest Speak Asia did not expect the James writ 383 case to settle all matters.

Senior Speak Asia panelists recently claimed the criminal case lacked basis in Mumbai, citing AISPA's payment to Navniit Kkhosla. They argued this settlement nullified the original complaint. But the EOW stated Navniit Kkhosla's returned money "will not impact the criminal case."

Kkhosla confirmed receiving "six demand drafts collectively amounting to the money I invested." He added, "I have not withdrawn the complaint. It is the state’s prerogative what it wants to do with the case."

Speak Asia senior panelists continue to reassure remaining members, claiming they "will definitely win." Meanwhile, the EOW is pressing on with its investigation. The investigation's latest development suggests a possible arrest for AISPA secretary Ashok Bahirwani. Bahirwani reportedly went into hiding late last year.