With his DFRF Enterprises Ponzi empire in ruins and a criminal court case looming, Daniel Filho has brought in the big guns.

Well, he’s brought in 
something…
but to what end we’re not sure.

In an affidavit filing by self-styled attorney-in-fact Lynn Schmaltz, a number of amusing demands are made.

For those unfamiliar with the term, an attorney-in-fact

is authorized to perform business-related transactions on behalf of someone else (the principal).

In order to become someone’s attorney in fact, a person must have the principal sign a power of attorney document.

This document designates the person as an agent, allowing him or her to perform actions on the principal’s behalf.

Schmaltz claims she was

instructed by the General Executor for the Patricia Lynn Kennedy Schmaltz Estate to make (a) Special Appearance on behalf of the Estate and Trust and the Trust(‘s) contact with Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho and DFRF Enterprises.

The exact nature of the Patricia Lynn Kennedy Schmaltz Estate is unclear but, with the mention of a trust agreement, it seems DFRF Enterprises Ponzi funds were likely funneled through it.

Schmaltz is evidently upset about interference ‘
with (the) confidential contract between Trust and DFRF
‘.

Verbatim, Schmaltz accuses the FBI and DOJ of

acting as executor for the Estate without authorization

acting as trustee for the Trust without authorization

interfering with confidential contract between Trust and DFRF

acting against DFRF, Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho and the Trust without properly disclosing grant of authority

utilizing Trust information in the Ponzi scheme and conspiracy case for corporate employees of a publicly-traded, for-profit corporation to kidnap Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho and hold him until he ‘agrees’ under threat of duress with allegations presented in said case

interfering with a contract between the Trust and DFRF causing harm and injury to DFRF, Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho and the Trust and its beneficiary(s)

acting with unclean hands

acting in bad faith

breaching estate trust laws and fiduciary duties

breaching the Golden Rule of Law

Despite the court itself not recognizing Schmaltz titled affidavit as such, he (she?) asserts that the DOJ and FBI having thus far failed to respond to the allegations above, means they ‘
have agreed with all the facts
‘.

Designating herself as ‘
the only one with the qualifications to order the following’,
Schmaltz demands the Massachusetts court (verbatim)

discharge (the) case immediately and no later han 2:00PM EST November 10, 2015 and provide evidence to declarant (Schmaltz) and Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho by no later than November 14, 2015

release Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho and permanently from the holding facility and provide Daniel Fernandes Rojo Filho with all expenses paid trip provided by United States District Court District of Massachusetts court/administrator’s funds to his home town in Florida including first class airfare on a flight sc

🤖 Quick Answer

What is an attorney-in-fact and what authorization is required?
An attorney-in-fact is a person legally authorized to conduct business transactions and perform actions on behalf of another individual, known as the principal. To assume this role, the principal must execute a power of attorney document that formally designates the agent and specifies their authority scope.

Who is Lynn Schmaltz in the Filho case?
Lynn Schmaltz filed an affidavit in the criminal case against Daniel Filho, presenting herself as an attorney-in-fact. She claims authorization from the General Executor of the Patricia Lynn Kennedy Schmaltz Estate to make various demands related to the proceedings.

What context surrounds the Filho criminal case?
Daniel Filho faces criminal charges following the collapse of his DFRF Enterprises, which operated as a Ponzi scheme. The filing of an unusual power of attorney document by Schmal

🔗 Related Articles

- Massachusetts charge TelexFree as “billion dollar Ponzi”
- CFTC secures Fundsz Ponzi asset-freeze, owners charged
- TelexFree insiders try to cut prelim injunction deals
- USFIA Receiver recovers $20.4 million
- Luiz Capuci Jr. upset SEC pursuing him in Brazil