On June 1st
Eaconomy
filed a motion to show cause, alleging
Auvoria Prime
should be held in contempt for violating an agreed upon restraining order.

The
agreement
was reached in April in lieu of a requested injunction, saving court time and legal fees for both parties.

As per the stipulated restraining order, Auvoria Prime and owner Sal Leto (right) were barred from recruiting Eaconomy affiliates.

Specifically Auvoria Prime and Leto are prohibited from

directly or in active concert with anyone else, knowingly recruit(ing), sponsor(ing) or solicit(ing)_ any existing Eaconomy, LLC distributor (known as an ISP) or customer to join Auvoria Prime, LLC as a distributor or customer.

As above, this includes both direct and indirect solicitation.

Auvoria Prime affiliates were also supposed to be sent an email advising them of the order. Eaconomy alleges this didn’t happen as required by the order.

A second email was eventually sent out, two months after the agreed order. Eaconomy allege this email also failed to provide adequate notice of the agreed upon order.

Auvoria Prime write the first email off as a “mistake”. They argue the second email sent out was adequate.

As put forth by Eaconomy in their motion;

Recently Eaconomy became aware that Auvoria violated the Order. Eaconomy received a recording of an agent of Auvoria violating the Order.

The video recording with audio shows an Eaconomy distributor scrolling through his Instagram direct messages with Catalina Naranjo which includes voice and text messages.

Ms. Naranjo has around 43,000 followers on Instagram and in the recording she claims she is the “head of education – Latin American – Spanish” and that “corporate brought [her] on board.”

In the recording, Ms. Naranjo solicits an Eaconomy distributor to join Auvoria.

She also slanders Eaconomy stating: Eaconomy’s owners (“Hassan and Candance”) did not pay commissions to her or her entire team in other companies, Eaconomy is not compliant with the law, and that Eaconomy is using old software meant for an iPhone 3 because Auvoria has an exclusive license to the software.

In their June 24th response to Eaconomy’s motion, Auvoria Prime and Sal Leto don’t deny Naranjo (right) is recruiting Eaconomy distributors.

Rather the defendants claim

The scope of this stipulated language was specifically negotiated to ensure that it did not extend to “indirect” conduct; that it did not apply to persons other than Mr. Leto or Auvoria.

Addressing the stipulated order’s indirect solicitation clause, Auvoria Prime and Leto claim

(Eaconomy) does not suggest that Mr. Leto or any of Auvoria’s other managers directed or were actively involved in – or were even aware of Ms. Naranjo’s efforts. They were not.

They go on to clarify Naranjo is not an Auvoria Prime employee, despite her corporate appointed role within the company.

Ms. Naranjo … has never been an Auvoria employee.

While Ms. Naranjo is a distributor in Auvoria’s network, this is an inde

🤖 Quick Answer

What is the legal dispute between Eaconomy and Auvoria Prime regarding the restraining order?
Eaconomy filed a motion on June 1st alleging Auvoria Prime violated an agreed restraining order established in April. The agreement prohibited Auvoria Prime and owner Sal Leto from recruiting Eaconomy affiliates, either directly or indirectly, through solicitation or sponsorship of existing distributors and customers.

🔗 Related Articles

- $450,000 payday settlement for Visalus securities fraud plaintiffs
- $17.9 mill DFRF final judgment, Heribeto Valdes up for $1.2 mill
- 63,000 TelexFree investors ripped off 831,000 victims
- BFIC Gold Review: Omar Khan’s 4th MLM crypto Ponzi
- Bulleto Review: Dubai-based smart-contract Ponzi cycler