On October 9th Charles Scoville has filed his reply to the SEC’s opposition brief.

That same day Scoville’s Traffic Monsoon Supreme Court writ was marked as distributed.

Whether the case will be heard by the Supreme Court is set to be decided via a scheduled November 1st conference.

Much like his
original writ
and the SEC’s opposition response, Scoville’s reply doesn’t bring anything new to the table.

It’s essentially the same “I should be able to scam non-US residents because nyer nyer!” argument.

This argument
failed in a District Court
and
again in the Tenth Circuit
.

Whether the Justices take up Scoville’s writ for hearing remains to be seen.

I’m not sure how far decisions lag behind Supreme Court case dockets but hopefully we’ll know on November 1st or shortly thereafter.

Update 5th November 2019 –
On November 1st Charles Scoville’s SCOTUS writ was
denied
.

🤖 Quick Answer

What is the status of Charles Scoville's Traffic Monsoon Supreme Court petition?
On October 9th, Scoville filed his reply to the SEC's opposition brief, and the writ was marked as distributed. The Supreme Court is scheduled to decide whether to hear the case at a November 1st conference. The Court will determine if the petition meets the criteria for Supreme Court review and oral argument.

What arguments does Scoville present in his Supreme Court reply?
Scoville's reply reiterates his contention that he should be permitted to operate his scheme for non-US residents without SEC restriction. This argument, substantively identical to his original writ and previous filings, previously failed at both the District Court and Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals levels.

🔗 Related Articles

- Scoville reveals Ernie Ganz keeping Traffic Hurricane Ponzi funds
- Scammers resurrect Traffic Monsoon Ponzi, again
- SEC claim Traffic Monsoon is a $207 million dollar Ponzi scheme
- Ernie Ganz & David Barker def judgments granted ($953K)
- Scoville addresses SEC, mixes religion with Ponzi scamming