A Simple Test for Fraud
The SEC's enforcement chief has a message for the multi-level marketing industry: if your distributors aren't selling to real customers, you're running a pyramid scheme.
Andrew Ceresney, who heads the SEC's Enforcement Division, laid out the distinction plainly at a joint symposium with the University of Illinois at Chicago this month on pyramid schemes and affinity fraud. A legitimate MLM, he said, sells genuine products to people outside the program. Participants make money when they—or the distributors they recruit—sell to actual customers.
That's it. That's the test.
Yet MLM companies keep trying to game it.
Many schemes operate with virtually no retail sales. Instead, products flow only to affiliates. When challenged, companies claim this still counts as retail because the affiliates are consumers buying product. They frame it as a legitimate sale.
It's sophistry. And the SEC sees through it.
The real problem with these no-retail schemes is simple: nobody knows what the product is actually worth. If a weight-loss supplement or nutritional drink had genuine market value, affiliates could sell it to regular customers. They don't. The products exist to create a paper transaction, nothing more.
This matters enormously from an enforcement perspective. Without external retail sales, the product's value effectively becomes zero. It's just a prop holding up a recruitment machine. Affiliates buy inventory or "starter kits." They recruit others to do the same. Those recruits must recruit more people. Money flows upward to those at the top. It's a closed loop with no outside revenue entering the system.
That's a pyramid scheme, regardless of what's printed on the bottle.
Recent SEC enforcement actions against major MLM operators prove the point. Yes, these companies sold tangible products—skincare lines, energy drinks, wellness supplements. But the products were window dressing. Participants didn't profit from selling to customers. They profited from recruitment. The FTC and SEC have pursued this distinction relentlessly, and it's the foundation of their litigation strategy.
The distinction Ceresney emphasized cuts through industry noise. "Genuine" doesn't mean the product is good or that people want it. It means the product isn't simply a vehicle for moving money through a recruitment funnel. A genuine product can exist independently. People would buy it at a store. Its price reflects actual market demand, not the financial needs of the MLM structure.
What you're seeing in comments defending autoship schemes—the latest MLM iteration—is an industry desperately trying to redefine what "retail" means. They want affiliate purchases to count. They want to blur the line between distribution and consumption.
Ceresney's message is: the line exists for a reason.
Without genuine external retail sales, there's no way to separate legitimate business from pyramid fraud. And without that separation, the entire structure becomes a mechanism for transferring money from new recruits to established ones. The product becomes irrelevant.
That's not a business model. That's a scheme.
🤖 Quick Answer
What is the SEC's definition of a legitimate multi-level marketing (MLM) operation according to Andrew Ceresney?According to the SEC's Enforcement Division chief Andrew Ceresney, a legitimate MLM must involve genuine retail sales to customers outside the program. Participants earn income through actual product sales by themselves or their recruited distributors to real customers, distinguishing lawful MLMs from illegal pyramid schemes lacking genuine external retail activity.
How do fraudulent MLM schemes typically operate differently from legitimate ones?
Fraudulent MLM schemes operate with minimal or no retail sales to external customers. Products circulate exclusively among affiliates within the program. When questioned by regulators, these companies attempt to justify the absence of genuine retail sales, masking pyramid scheme structures that generate income primarily through recruitment rather than legitimate product distribution.
🔗 Related Articles
- SEC files for default judgment against remaining DFRF defendants
- BidForMyMeds threaten legal action over review
- Michael Force & Mary Dee cut off from Digital Altitude victim funds
- Power Mining Pool securities cease and desist issued in North Carolina
- Sosana Review: Crypto manipulation securities fraud