After letting his mate Aidan Parr use his Telegram Ponzi bot in exchange for a 33% cut, Parr ran his own version of Laurie Suarez’s RecycleBot scam into the ground.
Parr’s
Promine Technologies
PowerBot collapse preceded Suarez publicly announcing he’d invest $250,000 of stolen Recycle Bot funds into the scheme.
That of course was when the pair were still on good terms.
Following Power Bot’s collapse, Parr has accused Suarez’s Ponzi bot developer of theft. Suarez in kind has admitted PowerBot was a Ponzi scheme all along.
Aidan Parr (right) initially attributed PowerBot’s collapse to a a
$60,000 heist by CoinPayments
.
When contacted, CoinPayments denied Parr’s allegations.
This left us to conclude PowerBot had collapsed and Parr blaming CoinPayments was Parr’s exit-scam strategy.
Note that CoinPayments has since locked the accounts of identified PowerBot investors.
Locked funds will only be released after 30 days if the investors provide CoinPayments, a Cayman Islands shell company run by who knows who from who knows where, with scanned copies of their passports.
Sometime over the past few days, Parr has now claimed that Laurie Suarez’s Ponzi bot developer
has been caught out manipulating the power bot. He has been reported to the police.
We also believe he has been stealing funds.
This prompted a response from Laurie Suarez, who accused Parr and “his silly side kick Zak Anstis”, of being “the povos of Delhi”.
You all may remember that in November 2018, we had anticipated an investment of $250,000 into a company called Promine Technologies, run by Aidan Parr.
The investment was agreed based on representation made by Parr in reference to the returns he claimed were being made by his mining venture.
At this time, we also had a fully developed bot, which was offered to Parr at a cost, which he agreed to take over and run as part of Promine Technologies.
At the time of Parr taking on the bot for his organisation at an agreed price, including all support and server arrangements, Parr commenced Power Bot.
Shortly after this time and after extensive investigation we concluded that the returns claimed by Parr that were being made by his mining operation were false and as result withdrew our offer to invest.
Parr continued with The Power Bot, and as you are all aware the Power Bot has lost Power and has now stopped paying people.
With this now Par and his silly side kick ZAK ANSTIS, have attempted to deflect the heat onto our Developers blaming them for the demise of Powerbot.
These two twits believe they could have run this business the same way they run their network marketing business by putting nothing in and leading their teams to bring them big returns and sit back and portray themselves as the sultans of Brunei when they are merely the povos of Delhi.
They have now proceeded to launch an attack our developers which is nothing short of disgraceful.
They have threatened his wife and blamed them for what can only be described
🤖 Quick Answer
What was the relationship between Laurie Suarez and Aidan Parr regarding PowerBot?Aidan Parr operated his own version of Suarez's RecycleBot Ponzi scheme using Suarez's Telegram bot in exchange for a 33% profit share. Suarez subsequently invested $250,000 of RecycleBot funds into PowerBot, establishing a financial partnership that later deteriorated into mutual accusations of theft and fraud.
How did PowerBot's collapse unfold?
Following PowerBot's technical failure, Parr initially attributed the collapse to a $60,000 theft by payment processor CoinPayments. However, CoinPayments denied these allegations. Analysis suggests the blame-shifting represented an exit-scam strategy rather than evidence of external theft.
What admissions did the parties make about PowerBot?
Suarez publicly admitted that PowerBot was fundament
🔗 Related Articles
- Athene Network Ponzi sued for trademark infringement
- Joby Weeks denied permission to withdraw guilty plea
- Ray Higdon settles with Traders Domain Receiver for $150K
- $48 million clawback lawsuit filed against Traffic Monsoon scammers
- Xtreme Green Review 2.0: Eco auto additives with no demand?
