Jason Cardiff’s request for $42,596 a month to cover his family’s expenses has been reduced to $4300 a month.

Of the $4300 granted, $2500 covers child support leaving $1800 for “groceries and daily necessities”.

The court declined to meet Cardiff’s $42,596 a month ask because expenses were
‘neither accurately calculated nor reasonably explicated in the record’
.

There are ongoing discussions between the parties to establish and verify the accuracy of the Cardiff’s claimed expenses.

In related news the FTC and Redwood Receiver have been granted permission to conduct additional discovery.

Said discovery pertains to

the nature, location, status, and extent of Defendants’ Assets and Receivership Property; or compliance with the Preliminary Injunctions or this Court’s 7/24/2020 Contempt Order.

Not sure whether any popcorn will come of the order yet but, given the Cardiff’s history of lying and concealment, who knows what the FTC and Receiver might uncover.

Stay tuned…

🤖 Quick Answer

How much monthly support was Jason Cardiff granted compared to his initial request?
Jason Cardiff received $4,300 monthly from his requested $42,596, representing approximately 10% of the amount sought. The court allocated $2,500 for child support and $1,800 for groceries and daily necessities, citing that Cardiff's expenses were neither accurately calculated nor reasonably explained in court records.

What reasons did the court provide for reducing Cardiff's expense request?
The court determined that Cardiff's claimed expenses of $42,596 monthly were neither accurately calculated nor reasonably explicated in the record, necessitating ongoing discussions between parties to establish and verify the accuracy of the stated expenses before full approval could be granted.

What additional discovery permissions were granted in this case?
The FTC and Redwood Receiver obtained court permission to conduct additional discovery regarding the nature, location, status, and extent of defendants' assets and

🔗 Related Articles

- $18.2 mill suspended judgment in FTC’s RengaLife case (updates)
- Vemma preliminary injunction hearing delayed till Sep 15th
- MOBE Receiver seeks to return $15.2M to FTC for distribution
- Neora pushes for renewed settlement discussions after AMG
- FTC & Arkansas file for BINT summary judgment