Metamask has blocked three GSPartners related domains for “nefarious activity”.
Metamask, a US-based software company, pitches itself as “the leading self-custodial wallet.”
The safe and simple way to access blockchain applications and web3. Trusted by millions of users worldwide.
On August 4th, Metamask Security Engineer “legobeat”
requested GSPartners be added to the platform’s blocklist
.
As above, legobeat’s reasoning for the request was GSPartners “selling false dreams” and also “misrepresent(ing) themselves as authors of PIVX”.
As per its website, PIVX is a “privacy-focused, proof of stake blockchain”.
Legobeat’s request was approved by Support Product Lead Alex Herman on August 5th. Three GSPartners website domains were added to Metamask’s blocklist later that same day.
Later still on August 5th, “gspdevelopment” appeared on Metamask’s Github to
beg for a reversal
.
The G999 blockchain uses Bitcoin Core code as well as PivX code, as described on the G999main.net site, with full credit and licensing attributed to both Core codes.
We hope this short but detailed explanation helps you in finding the correct information surrounding the sites which were wrongfully reported.
Following an internal review, on August 10th Alex Herman informed GSPartners “we are not unblocking these sites after further review.”
Since then several GSPartners investors have brought up the block on Metamask’s Github. As the matter is resolved, these requests have been closed.
On one such request, filed on August 5th, Alex Herman
informed an investor
GSPartners has been “explicitly blocked due to nefarious activity”.
Contrary to GSPartners’ representation to Metamask that it is “a legitimate and registered marketing platform.”, GSPartners commits securities fraud in the jurisdictions it solicits investment in.
in June 2022 the Central Bank of Comoros issued a
GSB Gold Standard Bank for fraud warning
due to misrepresentation GSB had regulatory approval to provide offshore banking activities (GSB Gold Standard Bank is GSPartners’ parent company)
on March 9th 2023 Quebec’s Autorite des Marches Financiers issued a
GSPartners securities fraud warning
on March 15th 2023, the Alberta Securities Commission added
GSTrade
and
G999
to its Investment Caution List for committing securities fraud
on May 19th 2023 the Alberta Securities Commission
added GSPartners to its Investment Caution List
for committing securities fraud
on May 30th 2023 the British Columbia Securities Commission issued a
securities fraud warning
for GSPartners, GSB Gold Standard Pay Ltd., GSB Gold Standard Bank Ltd., Gold Standard Trade, Lydian World, G999, GSTrade and Swiss Valorem Bank
on June 1st 2023 Saskatchewan’s Financial and Consumer Affairs Authority issued a
GSPartners securities fraud warning
on July 25th 2023 the Ontario Securities Commission issued a
GSPartners and Swiss Valorem Bank securities fraud warning
GSPartners
rebranded as Swiss Valorem Bank
after Can
🤖 Quick Answer
What domains did Metamask block related to GSPartners?Metamask blocked three GSPartners-related domains on August 5th following a security request. The exact domain names were added to the platform's blocklist after approval from Support Product Lead Alex Herman, based on allegations of misrepresentation and false claims regarding PIVX blockchain authorship.
Why did Metamask block GSPartners?
Metamask Security Engineer "legobeat" requested the blocklist addition, citing that GSPartners was "selling false dreams" and misrepresenting itself as the author of PIVX, a privacy-focused proof-of-stake blockchain. The request was approved and implemented within one day.
Who approved the blocking of GSPartners domains?
Alex Herman, Support Product Lead at Metamask, approved the blocklist request on August 5th, one day after Security Engineer "legobeat" submitted
🔗 Related Articles
- PGI Global dump US victims, promises $1000 refunds in BTC
- AladdinBOT Review: AI trading bot ruse Ponzi scheme
- Amzbit Review: Combining Amazon and bitcoin = cash gifting?
- BitCloud Academy Review: Another BitCoin pyramid scheme?
- Bitcoiin collapses, admins do a runner after $75 million B2G ICO
