Class-action defendants OneCoin, Ruja Ignatova and Gilbert Armenta have had entries of default recorded against them.

Requests for the court clerk issue certificates of default were made earlier this month.

Despite being served (at least on paper), neither OneCoin, Ignatova (right) or Armenta had filed a response to the
OneCoin class-action
.

The default certificates pave the way for OneCoin class-action Plaintiffs to file for default judgment.

While
Gilbert Armenta’s whereabouts are known
, securing default judgment against OneCoin and Ruja Ignatova prompts the question: What then?

OneCoin is being run by a skeleton staff crew out of Bulgaria. Ruja Ignatova
disappeared in late 2017
, she hasn’t been seen or heard from since.

Certificates of default were entered against OneCoin, Ignatova and Armenta on May 17th.

We’ll continue to monitor the class-action case docket for updates.

🤖 Quick Answer

What is the significance of default entries recorded against OneCoin and its associates?
Default entries against OneCoin, Ruja Ignatova, and Gilbert Armenta establish that defendants failed to respond to class-action litigation within required timeframes. These certificates enable plaintiffs to pursue default judgments without further defendant participation, streamlining legal proceedings despite challenges in locating defendants or enforcing judgments against entities with limited operational capacity.

🔗 Related Articles

- Is iPro Network a proxy for OneCoin’s US Ponzi scammers?
- John Maxwell to appear at OneCoin sponsored Colombian event
- 35 Chinese OneCoin affiliates arrested, jailed & fined
- ABA Marketing collapses, reboots as 7 Flags Club
- Former OneCoin executive claims CEO misled him